Start Here

Why Tax Compliance for a Foreign-Invested Company Is Harder Than It Looks

A Korean subsidiary files the same returns as any domestic company. What differs is everything attached to the parent relationship.

On paper, your Korean entity looks like any other Korean company. The same bookkeeping, the same VAT returns, the same corporate income tax return in March. That is precisely why a general practice can take it on and handle it perfectly well – until the transactions with head office begin.

The question worth asking is not whether your adviser can file a Korean tax return. It is whether anyone is looking at the items that exist only because the company is foreign-invested.

What We See

Three Ways These Items Go Missing

In practice, problems here rarely begin with a wrong answer. They begin where no one was asked the question.

Outside the agreed scope

International tax determinations and filings frequently sit outside a standard bookkeeping or advisory engagement. The adviser treats them as out of scope; the company assumes they are covered. Neither party has said anything untrue.

Decided once, then replicated

The treatment applied to the first head office invoice becomes the standard. When a new type of charge is added years later, it lands in the same box without a fresh assessment.

Nothing surfaces until everything does

No letter arrives to signal a missed filing or an incorrect rate. The position holds on paper year after year, and is then examined across every open year at once.

Working with a general practice is not the problem. The risk is that the items which exist only because the company is foreign-invested have never been assigned to anyone.

What to Ask

Seven Questions to Ask Your Korean Adviser

Each of these has a definite answer. What matters is whether it can be produced.

  • Who determined that withholding tax does or does not apply to payments made to head office, and where is that determination recorded?
  • On what basis are charges to head office zero-rated for VAT, and does the return as filed reflect that basis?
  • Are the annual international transaction filings within the engagement scope, and have they been filed for prior years?
  • When a new type of intercompany charge is introduced, who assesses it before the first invoice is issued?
  • Who reviews capital transactions with the parent – loans, capital increases, share transfers – for Korean filing consequences?
  • Where head office prepares transfer pricing documentation, who confirms that the Korean filings are consistent with it?
  • If a prior-year position turns out to be wrong, who handles the correction and the communication with the tax authority?

An adviser does not need to handle every one of these in house. But before the next filing season, each of them should have a name attached to it.

Not Sure What Your Current Scope Covers?

Send us your engagement scope, or simply tell us which of the seven questions above you cannot answer today. We will identify where the gaps are.

No confidential figures are required for an initial review.

Email Us for a Scope Review

Need professional advice?

Contact Us